|
|
Your
Ad Here!
Send Email to: publisher@newmusicon.org |
CONTENTSIN THIS ISSUE ..., 3 An Interview with George Walker, Duffie, 5 LEGATO NOTES LIVE EVENTS
Scelsi:
“All of the Above” Pehrson, 15 DOTTED NOTES
from… SPEAKING OUT RECORDINGS CDS
IN BRIEF & RECENT RELEASES THE
PUZZLE CORNER: COMPOSER INDEX, 26 BULLETIN BOARD, 27 WEB SUPPLEMENTGala AnnouncementFestivalDresdener Tage des Zeitgenössisches Musik
|
Scelsi: "All of the Above"by Joseph Pehrson ©2004 ‘Giacinto Scelsi: Composer Portraits Series’ —ensemble Sequitur. Soloists: Michael Lowenstern, clarinet; Curtis Macomber, violin; Elizabeth Farnum, soprano; Paul Hostetter, conductor. Miller Theatre February 26, 2004. I expected a curiosity. The general word is that the composer Giacinto Scelsi is an obsessed mystic, repeating single notes ad infinitum in a peculiar, but expressive minimalism. However, the pieces presented by Sequitur, in collaboration with George Steel’s Miller Theatre, showed a much broader portrait, one informed by currents of traditional European contemporary music. Yes, it is true that Scelsi was a bit—er—"peculiar." He didn’t, in later years, want to be called a composer, but instead a "messenger" or "medium" receiving sounds from... well, don’t ask. Additionally, there is good evidence that he didn’t write down some of his own works. Maybe he didn’t have the traditional technique for that? Instead, he recorded his improvisations and aural visions on tape and he would hire amanuenses to notate the scores for him. (In an interesting twist of fate, some of these composer-assistants have come forward recently, as Scelsi has become famous, claiming they are the real "authors.")
So, there is little question why this composer, a wealthy count, was viewed in his lifetime as a musical dilettante. Almost all of Scelsi’s "mature" works have peculiar titles. Nobody seems to know what they mean. Nor is there information on the Internet, aside from the explanation that they are allusions to obscure Asian mythology. Scelsi, like many composers, had several different phases of his work. These included a brief .irtation with Serialism. However, the love affair soon soured and he had a nervous breakdown, caused, some say, by his rejection of Serialism’s rigid control. His therapy consisted of playing a single note over and over on the piano, listening to .ne gradations of tone and dynamic. These revelations led to his original and novel views of music, in addition to, most probably, oblique stares by the nurses at the institution where he was recovering. He became a dedicated microtonalist... Find out what happened next by subscribing to the NMC.
|